New policy aims to reduce number of Kansans in nursing homes

The Kansas Department on Aging has put together a list of 800 nursing home residents who officials believe might be able to move to less expensive, less institutional settings.

The agency has asked the state’s Area Agencies on Aging and Centers for Independent Living to have their case managers meet with each of the 800 residents to see if they are able and willing to move.

The effort is part of Aging Secretary Shawn Sullivan's ongoing effort to reduce the number of people in nursing homes. Kansas, with its disproportionately elderly population, has a higher percentage of people in full-care nursing homes than all but a handful of other states.

KDoA officials have pledged to pay the case manager’s employer $2,000 for each Medicaid-funded nursing home resident who is able to move out of the nursing home and stay out for at least 90 days.

KDoA Secretary Shawn Sullivan said the payments were designed to offset some of the uncompensated case management costs that hamstrung earlier efforts to reduce the state’s nursing home population.

'Beyond belief'

But the notion of rewarding someone for helping people move out of nursing homes has upset the state’s nursing home lobby.

“It’s a bounty. There’s no other word for it,” said Cindy Luxem, executive director of the Kansas Health Care Association, which represents most of the state’s for-profit nursing homes. “If a nursing home paid a case manager a bonus for every resident they got to move there from another nursing home – that’s a felony,” Luxem said. “It’s illegal, but here we have the state paying bonuses to case managers who are essentially doing the same thing. They’re being rewarded for getting people to move out.”

She also said it seemed unfair that nursing homes aren’t paid $2,000 when their social workers help residents return home or move to community-based settings.

“For us, this is just beyond belief,” Luxem said of the agency’s new policy.

But Sullivan said the nursing home industry was mischaracterizing the payments, which have not started because the policy is so new.

“It’s not a bounty,” Sullivan said. “It’s an attempt to cover some of the administrative costs that haven’t been covered in the past.”

In recent years, KDoA stopped reimbursing Agencies on Aging for their case managers’ mileage and travel time.

The Kansas Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services has never covered the so-called “windshield time” incurred by case managers with the Centers for Independent Living.

Nor does either of the state agencies cover the costs of required training for the case managers.

The Area Agencies on Aging and Centers for Independent Living are the local agencies charged with assessing current or potential nursing home residents to determine what level of assistance each may need.

More independence, less cost

Sullivan said no one who’s living in a nursing home would be forced to move as a result of the new policy.

The initiative, he said, is designed to give the 800 residents and their family members information on services that could be made available to them in their communities. The result could be more independence for the beneficiaries and their families, and savings for the Medicaid program.

Sullivan said the $2,000 payments would be state-funded and come from the department’s administrative budget. Each payment will be made in three installments.

Continue reading on khi.org.

Tagged: medicaid, neglect, staff, kdoa, $2000, payments, nursing, homes, kancare, aging, cms, care, kansas

Comments

Lenette Hamm 5 years, 7 months ago

So where does the money come from in a year of fiscal chaos? Who covers all the costs incurred by the move back to the community or a person's home? Sure there are people who may qualify to move out of the nursing home they're in, but will it be safe for them to do so? This is very frightening...and yet another poorly thought out move by the Governor and his sidekicks.

verity 5 years, 7 months ago

Why does this whole thing make me feel really uneasy? I'm all for people living as independently as they are able, but this sounds like another hare-brained scheme that will cost more money for worse services.

It's not like people are generally jumping at the chance to move into a nursing home. At least that's not been my experience.

BigDog 5 years, 7 months ago

Well your state/federal government pay for Medicaid eligible individuals who also are functionally eligible. So Medicaid pays for them at $1,200 avg. per month for in-home services that the individual needs or Mediciad pays for them at $3,500 avg. per month for nursing home care.

If you read the article, these individuals and familiy are offered the opportunity .... no one is being required to leave the nursing home.

Sometimes these are individuals who went to the nursing home when they had a health situation .... broke a hip per se, they went there for physical rehab ... became more independent and really don't need the nursing home level of care and could be supported well in the community.

In the end it is giving the person the opportunity to make an educated choice. I don't see anything that is a "hare brained scheme" about that.

verity 5 years, 7 months ago

I hope you are right---I've gotten paranoid because of the many attempts by the state recently to take away what seem to be needed services.

The $2,000 payment can be seen as a bribe and could cause case managers to be pressured by their employers to recommend things not in the best interests of the resident.

These are our most vulnerable citizens---many can't advocate for themselves and may have no family to do so for them.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.